DayZero2DayOne

Enterprise Data & AI
DayZero2DayOne Research · Oct 2026
Invitation Only Assessment Invitation Only Assessment
Executive Research Study · By Invitation Only

Would you sign for your AI?

Six minutes, anonymous, and you get your personalized result straight away. Answer about the AI system in your organization that you know best.

6 Min
Quick 1-tap questions
1 System
No whole-company guessing
Instant
Quadrant score & one fix
Research Ethics & Protocol: Co-hosted by Babita Kumari and Dilip Singh. This survey is voluntary and confidential. Responses are analyzed and published only in aggregate (minimum 20 responses per cohort). No company names are gathered. Email requests for the final research report are kept in an isolated database separate from your survey answers.
Part 1 · The Gut Check

If the AI system with the most freedom in your area made a costly mistake tonight, whose phone would ring?

Pick the answer that best reflects operational reality today.

Part 1 · The Gut Check

Which seat are you in?

Required for question routing and matched-pair comparison across your organization.

🙏

Thank You for Your Interest

This research study specifically benchmarks organizations where builders, executive leaders, or risk officers manage AI systems in production.

You can share this assessment with colleagues in engineering or leadership to see where your organization places on the Readiness Matrix.

Part 1 · The Gut Check

Is AI live in your area right now?

Required for survey routing and cohort categorization.

Part 1 · The Gut Check

Is your AI mostly built by your team, or does it come inside software you buy?

E.g., Microsoft Copilot, Salesforce Agentforce, ServiceNow, or custom in-house LLM pipelines.

Part 2 · Pick One System

Focus on your most autonomous system

Now think of one AI system: the one in your area that's allowed to do the most on its own.

Keep this specific system in mind for the next questions. You will answer about what this system can actually do and who it impacts.

Part 2 · Pick One System

What can it do without a person approving first?

Select the highest level of freedom it possesses today.

Part 2 · Pick One System

If it got something wrong, who would feel it?

Select all that apply.

Part 3 · Could a Builder Sign? (1 of 5)

Before it launched, was it tested on real cases from your own data, not the vendor's demo?

Real enterprise cases, production edge cases, and golden test sets.

Part 3 · Could a Builder Sign? (2 of 5)

Does it run with its own limited permissions, not someone's login or an admin account?

Principle of least privilege, scoped service accounts, and token boundaries.

Part 3 · Could a Builder Sign? (3 of 5)

If it did something wrong at 2 a.m., would you find out before a customer told you?

Proactive observability, runtime anomaly detection, or threshold alerts.

Part 3 · Could a Builder Sign? (4 of 5)

Has anyone actually tried switching it off or rolling it back?

Tested circuit breakers, kill-switches, or state rollback drill.

Part 3 · Could a Builder Sign? (5 of 5)

Does a person or an automated check look at its output before it takes effect?

Pre-flight evaluation, policy guardrail, or sampled inspection.

Part 4 · Could a Leader Sign? (1 of 5)

Can you name the number it's supposed to improve?

A defined business KPI, operational efficiency target, or revenue metric.

Part 4 · Could a Leader Sign? (2 of 5)

Do you know what it really costs, including the people who check or fix its work?

Total cost of ownership including tokens, hosting, and human remediation time.

Part 4 · Could a Leader Sign? (3 of 5)

Is one named person, not a team, accountable when it gets something wrong?

A designated individual owner who answers for operational failures.

Part 4 · Could a Leader Sign? (4 of 5)

Has anyone written down how many mistakes are acceptable?

Documented error budgets, SLA thresholds, or formal risk tolerance criteria.

Part 4 · Could a Leader Sign? (5 of 5)

Is there a date when someone will decide whether to keep it, scale it back or switch it off?

A scheduled review milestone where deprecation or decommissioning is an explicit option.

Part 5 · From Your Seat (Builder Perspective)

In the past year, has something you said wasn't ready launched anyway?

Engineering authority in deployment decisions.

Part 5 · From Your Seat (Executive Perspective)

In the past year, has an AI target pushed a launch your engineers said wasn't ready?

Strategic time-to-market pressure vs engineering caution.

Part 5 · From Your Seat (Risk & Governance)

When does your team usually first hear about a new AI system?

Governance and compliance involvement window.

Part 6 · What's Happened (Past 12 Months)

Has AI in your area done any of these?

Select all that have occurred in production.

Part 6 · What's Happened (Past 12 Months)

Has any AI system been rolled back, scaled down or switched off after launch?

Operational retractions, pilot cancellations, or rollbacks.

Part 6 · What's Happened (Past 12 Months)

In a normal week, how many hours does your team spend checking or fixing AI output?

Human-in-the-loop oversight and rework cost.

Comparison Cohort · What's in the way

What's the biggest thing in the way of putting AI live in production?

Pick the primary blocker inside your company.

Part 7 · The Verdict

Think about that one system again. Would you put your name to it today?

If asked to sign a formal production sign-off sheet right now.

Part 7 · The Verdict

Gut feel, 0–10: how ready is your area for AI that acts without a person approving each step?

0 = Completely unprepared · 10 = Fully battle-tested & ready

0 · Unprepared 5 · Moderate 10 · Fully Ready
Part 8 · About Your Company (1 of 3)

Company size

Approximate total workforce headcount.

Part 8 · About Your Company (2 of 3)

Industry

Your organization's primary domain.

Part 8 · About Your Company (3 of 3)

Region

Where your primary team or operations are situated.

Final Question · Executive Perspectives

One thing that makes AI safe to sign for where you work, or the one thing that's missing.

Optional. Selected anonymous observations will be analyzed on DayZero2DayOne.

Ready to Sign

Ready to Sign

Both builder evidence and leader consequences are in place.

DayZero2DayOne Readiness Matrix Cutoff: 4 of 5 for each signature
Built, nobody owns it
High evidence (≥4/5), Low consequence ownership (<4/5). Rigorous testing, but diffuse responsibility.
Ready to sign
High evidence (≥4/5), High consequence ownership (≥4/5). Highest tier of operational maturity.
Uncharted territory
Low evidence (<4/5), Low consequence ownership (<4/5). Autonomous actions proceeding without safety nets.
Committed without proof
Low evidence (<4/5), High consequence ownership (≥4/5). Strategic mandate declared without engineering proof.
0/5
Evidence Score (Builder)
0/5
Consequences Score (Leader)
0%
AI Readiness Index
The One Fix That Matters Most
Loading diagnostic recommendation...
⚖️
Perception vs. Verified Practice Gap: 0 pts
Difference between your gut readiness rating (Q10) and your organization's reported controls on real data, rollback drills, and mistake budgets.

Industry Context & Comparative Benchmarks

53% of organizations report AI agents exceeding intended permissions in production (Cloud Security Alliance, Apr 2026).
Over 40% of agentic AI projects will be cancelled or scaled down by 2027 due to architectural and governance gaps (Gartner, Jun 2025).
Over half of enterprise teams spend multiple hours every week correcting and reviewing unverified AI output (Collibra / Harris Poll, Sep 2026).

Get the Full 2026 Research Report

Be among the first executives and builders to receive the complete DayZero2DayOne benchmark paper with full industry and company-size cross-tabulations.

🔒 Strict Privacy Protocol: In accordance with DayZero2DayOne research guidelines, email addresses are stored in an isolated registry and are strictly never linked to individual survey responses.